The May 7 package proposed a $742,000 Fair Oaks Ranch share of a 5,000-foot shared water pipeline with Boerne and paired it with a five-year forecast of higher tax bills and a 2028 water base-rate increase.
For Fair Oaks Ranch residents, the model put the projected household tax bill at about $1,876 a year in 2026 and a peak near $2,155 a year—about $279 more annually, or $23.25 a month—while the monthly water base charge was modeled to rise $5.30, from $26.48 to $31.78, in fiscal 2028.
Those figures were planning assumptions, not adopted bills. The packet said the forecast would return for formal adoption after council direction, and annual tax and utility-rate actions would still require their own public process.
A Pipeline Built for Two Cities
The pipeline proposal built on Boerne’s 2022 purchase of about 10 acres at 329 Ammann Road and Fair Oaks Ranch’s 2025 purchase of about 2.9 acres at the same site. Boerne planned a water plant there; Fair Oaks Ranch planned an elevated storage tank.
The proposed 16-inch line would run about 5,000 feet along Ammann Road before branching to the two properties. Both cities intend to receive purchased Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority water at the site. City staff said the project would support northern Fair Oaks Ranch, strengthen Pressure Zone A and accommodate anticipated growth.
The draft agreement assigned 69% of shared costs to Boerne and 31% to Fair Oaks Ranch, based on planned water volumes. Fair Oaks Ranch’s estimate included $682,000 for shared work and $60,000 for redesign and pipeline encasement where changes to Ammann Road’s southern curve would cross the line. The city had budgeted $750,000.
The Five-Year Pressure Points
The financial plan assumed property values would grow about 5% annually, sales-tax growth would slow from roughly 7% to 5%, wages would rise 4.5% a year and medical insurance and professional services would climb about 5%. It included no additional staffing.
Fire and EMS contract costs formed the sharpest stated pressure, rising through modeled annual amounts of $1.45 million, $1.9 million, $2.25 million, $2.72 million and $2.84 million. The forecast used property-tax adjustments and fund balance to bridge near-term gaps, with the unassigned balance fully used by the fifth year and limited use of the Budget Stabilization Reserve.
For water customers, the model kept the existing base charge through fiscal 2027, then raised it by $5.30 in fiscal 2028—about 20%—and increased each usage tier by 5%. The packet said the base rate had not changed since 2017. Those figures remain forecasts until the council takes the required rate action.
What the Outcome Record Can Establish
The official agenda shows the pipeline agreement and 2026 Strategic Plan as possible-action items, followed by workshops on the budget calendar and financial plan. The archived minutes file was not text-readable in the preserved source, so this breakdown does not state how the council voted.
The agreement allowed either city to exit within 30 days of the final bid price, while the financial plan called for further council direction and later adoption. Those are the next records that can show whether the pipeline estimate held and which tax, reserve and utility assumptions survived the budget process.
Readers can use the city’s meeting record to open the agenda, packet, archived minutes and official recording for the May 7 session. The full agenda packet is the most useful source for checking the proposed pipeline terms and every input in the five-year forecast.