Packages are not a decision.
We identify which options are under discussion, what each includes, who decides, and what funding action comes next.
Editorial standards
How Comal.News reports the county.
Our job is to tell readers what happened, how we know, what it means locally, and what remains unanswered. These standards apply to breaking news, public-record reporting, data work, interviews, photography, and corrections.
We distinguish fact from assertion, a proposal from an outcome, and a reasonable question from a proven conclusion. When the evidence is incomplete, the story says so plainly.
From tip to publication
The reporting process
The amount of reporting varies with the story, but the standard does not: material claims must be attributable, verifiable, and presented in their proper context.
- 01→
Start with primary sources
Read the original agenda, filing, contract, dataset, recording, or firsthand account—not someone else’s summary.
- 02→
Establish the status
Separate what is proposed, scheduled, approved, signed, funded, completed, disputed, or still unknown.
- 03→
Report beyond the document
Seek responses from responsible officials, affected residents, businesses, and independent subject specialists.
- 04→
Check material claims
Verify names, dates, amounts, quotations, calculations, and context before they reach a headline or alert.
- 05→
Show the evidence
Link records, explain calculations, attribute information, and state clearly when the available evidence has limits.
- 06
Correct and follow up
Update continuing stories as decisions change and publish clear correction notes when the record needs repair.
Developing stories
The first public record starts the reporting. It does not finish it.
Overlapping scopes need an answer.
We compare vendor, purpose, equipment, dates, and terms before treating separate quotes as one purchase total.
A missing rate changes the picture.
We report the known term, identify the unstated cost, and seek the addendum before presenting a full-year price.
A meeting notice is not an outcome.
We seek the proposed language, each side’s position, the result of the meeting, and the next scheduled step.
Source hierarchy
Closer to the original evidence is better.
Anonymous tips and social posts can point us toward a story, but they do not prove it. We work back to original records, direct observation, named sources, or reproducible data before making a material claim.
Public meetings
Agendas, discussions, votes, and signed actions are different records.
- BeforeRead the agenda and packet, identify the decision requested, and note missing attachments.
- DuringWatch or attend when possible, attribute speakers, and preserve the wording of motions and votes.
- AfterConfirm the outcome against minutes, video, vote records, contracts, or signed instruments.
- ContextCompare the action with prior promises, budgets, related votes, and the people it affects.
- Follow-upKeep watching for implementation, cost changes, deadlines, appeals, and measurable results.
Photography and graphics
Images should clarify the reporting—not overstate it.
We request permission before using community photographs or video and provide credit. Charts, maps, and illustrations are labeled, sourced, and designed so a reader can understand what the underlying data does and does not show.
“Hi — may Comal.News use your photo/video in our coverage? We’ll give you credit as [name]. Please reply yes if that’s okay.”
Corrections and transparency
We link primary records whenever possible, identify the source of calculations, label developing information, and preserve meaningful correction notes. Readers can challenge a fact or submit supporting evidence at any time.