Open site navigation
Explore Comal.News
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comal County, TexasUpdated throughout the day
Local intelligence for a fast-growing county
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comal County news deskLocal reporting, every day

Bulverde council denies 387-acre development plan, adopts budget and tax rate

The Sept. 22 decisions affect a proposed Highway 281 development, the coming city budget, park fees and specific streets; two proposed speed-limit ordinances were pulled for revision.

Listen to this articleComal.News narrated edition
Ready · 0:00 / 7:17
Ink illustration of a cream-colored field with blue trees, a distant building, a rust-colored gate, a dashed boundary, and loose sheets of paper.
Illustration: A conceptual view of undeveloped land and a proposed development near Bulverde; it does not depict the council meeting or a specific property.Original editorial illustration; not a photograph and does not depict the reported event or an exact property.Comal.News Visual Desk · Original illustration · Source ↗ · Comal.News original illustration ↗

Bulverde City Council's Sept. 22 decisions changed the course of a large Highway 281 development request, set the city's coming budget and tax rate, and authorized several site-specific and street measures.

Council denied the request by Trimark Development LP and OneTop Group LP, on behalf of Dash Interest LLC and Akbar Ali, to establish a planned development district for single-family, multifamily and commercial uses on about 387 acres at 31575 Highway 281 North. The reviewed official recording establishes the denial; it does not establish a precise vote tally for that motion.

Development and land use

The Sept. 22 agenda proposed a planned development district on about 387 acres at 31575 Highway 281 North. Council voted to move item 3L, the McCarti Ranch planned development district request, up to be the first regular agenda item. Mayor Hayes recused herself from the decision, and Mayor Pro Tem Joe Alexander presided, according to the reviewed outcome. The denial means this proposed district did not receive approval at this meeting; the record provided here does not establish what the applicants will do next.

Council voted to move items 3H and 3I up on the agenda. Council approved an ordinance granting a special use permit for a 634-square-foot guest house at 34712 Mayer Oaks. Council approved an ordinance granting a special use permit for a 950-square-foot guest house at 31910 Lake Wind. The permit lets the guest house sit 15 feet into the standard side setback. Councilman Craits opposed the Lake Wind approval, according to the reviewed outcome.

Council approved an ordinance granting a special use permit for an indoor baseball training and athletic performance facility at 18443 State Highway 46, Building 3. Council approved an ordinance granting a sign variance at 3131 Bulverde Road. The variance lets Security State Bank move its existing sign onto its own property because TxDOT is taking the land where the sign now stands. These permissions concern the named properties; the reviewed decisions do not establish construction or opening dates.

Budget, taxes and park fees

Council adopted the city's budget for the fiscal year running Oct. 1, 2026, through Sept. 30, 2027, as presented. Council adopted a resolution ratifying the newly adopted budget, which contains a property tax rate that raises more total property taxes than the previous year. Council adopted a 2026 property tax rate of 0.295343, which was described as effectively a 13.68% increase in the tax rate. The reviewed rate vote was 7-0. Residents can inspect the budget and tax decisions in the official recording; the adoption records should be read separately from the earlier proposal figures.

Before the meeting, the agenda's taxpayer statement proposed $0.295343 per $100 of value, compared with $0.259798 for 2025, and estimated a median-homestead city tax bill of $1,605 versus $1,358 in 2025. Those household figures were proposal-stage estimates, not a verified final bill for any property. The packet presentation listed proposed general-fund revenue of $10,597,573 and expenditures of $10,326,549 for the coming fiscal year; those figures describe the presented plan, while the separately reviewed vote establishes adoption of the budget as presented.

Council approved an ordinance amending the city park facility fee schedule, including fees for using and renting city park facilities. The approval included a correction to the ordinance's section numbering. The draft packet proposed a two-hour reservation minimum, resident two-hour charges of $100 for a gazebo, $70 for a pavilion and $20 for a basketball court or practice field, plus a $35 nonresident surcharge. Because the reviewed vote describes the fee-schedule ordinance and its numbering correction without reciting each final charge, readers should check the executed ordinance before relying on a particular fee or refund term.

Council voted to move item 3B, on city manager compensation, so it would be taken up with item 3O. The packet described compensation above a budgeted 5% cost-of-living and merit adjustment as a matter for council determination. The reviewed procedural motion establishes the move; this guide makes no claim about a later compensation amount.

Street safety measures

Council approved the itemized cost estimates for improvements recommended in the signs and safety study. The total was estimated at $39,433, with staff doing the work. The raised crosswalk on Wally Road was left out. The estimate and exclusion define the scope of that approval; they do not establish that construction has been completed.

Council approved an ordinance adding a stop sign at the intersection of Casey Road and Barton Hill Drive. Council approved an ordinance creating a 135-foot no-parking zone on the north side of Marble Drive west of Premier Drive. Drivers and nearby residents should look to the posted controls and final ordinances for implementation details.

Two ordinances were pulled from the agenda and will return at the next meeting because of problems with their wording. One would lower the citywide speed limit from 35 to 30 mph, and the other would set a 25 mph limit in the Edge Brook subdivision. The proposed limits were therefore not adopted in these reviewed actions; their revised wording and next hearing are the immediate records to watch.

Citizen comments

The supplied agenda describes opportunities for testimony when an item is considered and for general comments after regular business. The retained outcome reviews document short motion and vote segments; they do not establish what people said during the budget, tax or land-use hearings or the general-comment period, or what council or staff said in response. This source limitation does not establish that nobody spoke. The full official recording is the reader's route to inspect those portions while a detailed comment account remains to be verified.

What to watch next

The next council agenda and executed ordinances should show when the revised speed-limit proposals return and when the approved fee and traffic controls take effect. The official recording verifies the Sept. 22 motions and votes reported here; the next posted agenda and signed ordinances are the primary records for the remaining implementation details.

From the source record

Verified meeting recordBulverde City Council, Sept. 22, 2026
Council denied the request by Trimark Development LP and OneTop Group LP, on behalf of Dash Interest LLC and Akbar Ali, to establish a planned development district for single-family, multifamily and commercial uses on about 387 acres at 31575 Highway 281 North.
Official City Council recording ↗
A labeled evidence graphic presents the reviewed outcome of the Sept. 22 meeting.

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

A clear morning briefing, with direct links to the records and sources behind each story.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.