Open site navigation
Explore Comal.News
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comal County, TexasUpdated throughout the day
Local intelligence for a fast-growing county
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comal County news deskLocal reporting, every day

What happened to New Braunfels District 1 road fees?

District 1 fee payers and drivers now face a timing question: a city report says some road fees were spent after an applicable ten-year deadline, while the city reviews how it assigned transactions to projects.

A winding blue road leads toward a building, with blank stacked papers, a clock, and a rust-colored dashed line in the foreground.
Illustration: A symbolic road, papers, and clock evoke the review of District 1 road fee spending; this does not depict a reported event.Original editorial illustration; not a photograph and does not depict the reported event or an exact property.Comal.News Visual Desk · Original illustration · Source ↗ · Comal.News original illustration ↗

A city-posted agreed-upon-procedures report says approximately $287,151 in New Braunfels District 1 roadway impact fees was spent after the applicable ten-year deadline.

That is a timing finding in the city's retrospective review, not a bill for each household or a finding that a particular road project was improper. The city's agreed-upon-procedures report gives the figure in Exhibit C.

District 1 fee payers and drivers have a stake in when road-fee collections became spending on roads serving their area. The useful question is which payments and projects produced the flagged amount, and whether a more precise allocation changes it.

What the numbers show

From inception through Sept. 30, 2025, Exhibit C lists $2,944,741 in District 1 development fees and $167,023 in interest. Exhibit C lists capital expense of $2,238, services of $304,426, other uses of $774,644, transfers out of $1,127,142, and a $903,314 net change. These are district-wide accounting categories over the period, not a breakdown of the timing finding.

District 1 roadway impact-fee activity from inception through Sept. 30, 2025
Exhibit C categoryAmount
Development fees$2,944,741
Interest$167,023
Capital expense($2,238)
Services($304,426)
Other($774,644)
Transfers out($1,127,142)
Net change$903,314

Parentheses indicate outflows. Source: city agreed-upon-procedures report, Exhibit C.

The $903,314 net change is the result of those listed inflows and outflows; it is distinct from the report's approximately $287,151 late-spending finding. One figure describes the accounting roll-up. The other flags when some fees were spent.

Who pays, and what is still being traced

The city posts its roadway impact-fee ordinance and fee schedule separately from the retrospective financial review. The schedule describes a charge tied to development. The timing finding concerns older District 1 collections and spending, so the next useful accounting step is to match the flagged transactions to their payment dates and the projects that received the money.

The report says no related refund petitions had been received. That statement does not determine whether anyone is owed a refund. The report describes an agreed-upon-procedures review rather than an audit opinion, so its finding should be read with the work it actually performed.

What to watch next

The report says the city was reviewing transactions and project expenditures for a possible refined allocation method. That work could clarify which District 1 spending fell inside the report's ten-year window and which spending produced the flagged figure. The next public check is the city's Oct. 26 roadway impact-fee hearing material and any completed allocation review; the best available starting point is Exhibit C in the city report.

From the source record

District 1 development-fee activity in the city's agreed-upon-procedures report, Exhibit C.Inception-to-date figures through Sept. 30, 2025.

Related coverage

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

A clear morning briefing, with direct links to the records and sources behind each story.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.