Open site navigation
Explore Comal.News
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comal County, TexasUpdated throughout the day
Local intelligence for a fast-growing county
Send a tip

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

Comal County news every morning, with links to the original sources.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comal County news deskLocal reporting, every day

Schertz and Cibolo to discuss future of shared water assets Oct. 22

Future water service and development costs are at stake as Schertz and Cibolo prepare to discuss a possible sale or lease framework for shared assets.

Two blue water vessels with inward-facing pipes flank a shallow bowl and an open blank book on cream-colored ground.
Illustration: Two water vessels and an open book symbolize a discussion of shared water assets; this does not depict the meeting.Original editorial illustration; not a photograph and does not depict the reported event or an exact property.Comal.News Visual Desk · Original illustration · Source ↗ · Comal.News original illustration ↗

Schertz and Cibolo councils are scheduled to discuss the future of Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation water assets on Oct. 22, including a possible sale or lease framework.

The joint session moves from the corporation's original purpose and each city's water needs to possible transaction terms and a timetable for reviewing offers. Those are subjects for discussion in the posted agenda, not completed decisions. The full meeting agenda shows how the five topics fit together.

The questions before both councils

Item 1 calls for a review of why the Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation was incorporated. That starting point matters because the councils are weighing future uses of assets held through a shared corporation. The discussion then turns to the water each city has and expects to need, before asking what each wants the corporation to accomplish.

Item 2 calls for an overview of the two cities' water portfolios and projected future water needs. The item page identifies the comparison as a separate discussion, giving residents a way to distinguish present supplies from forecasts. The supporting material includes a Cibolo service-area map, a Schertz supply-and-demand presentation and a water-provider overview; their projections should be read as planning material, not a settled allocation of water rights.

Cibolo's water summary lists current supply at 3,800 acre-feet per year and usage of about 2,550 acre-feet per year. Those figures are the city's stated current baseline; they do not by themselves resolve how much water it may need later or what each city should receive from CVLGC. Residents comparing the cities' positions can use the Cibolo water summary to see the basis for that part of the discussion.

Item 3 asks what each city wants from CVLGC and how the corporation could support those goals. Cibolo's council-consensus document reports majority support among respondents for the corporation's purpose, with reservations, and majority support for retaining water rights. It also records disagreement over the volume of rights and future taxpayer investment. Those are summarized positions for the upcoming conversation, not a joint council agreement. The Cibolo consensus document gives readers the underlying range of views.

Schertz staff's summary says the city wants guaranteed access to the water it needs in the future while limiting immediate development costs. The summary reflects direction from Schertz's Oct. 13 workshop, which predates this joint meeting. Read alongside Cibolo's positions, it shows why access, timing and who pays for development are likely to matter when the councils explore a common path. The Schertz workshop summary is the source for that city's stated direction.

Item 4 schedules discussion of a possible sale or lease transaction framework for CVLGC water assets. Item 5 schedules discussion of a timeline for reviewing offers. A framework could determine which rights remain available to each city and what financial or operational conditions would apply; the agenda does not settle those terms. The paired topics make the next public record especially useful: it should show whether the councils simply explore options or give staff a concrete direction.

How residents can take part

The joint meeting is scheduled for Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building 4, Schertz. The posted agenda provides the location, time and order of business for anyone planning to attend.

The agenda includes a Hearing of Residents. People who want to speak must register before the meeting, and the agenda sets a three-minute limit. Residents may use that opportunity to ask how future water access, development costs and any review of offers would affect service. The agenda's Hearing of Residents instructions are the primary guide to participation; this preview cannot report what anyone will say at a meeting that has not occurred.

What to watch next

The useful test after Oct. 22 will be the meeting record: whether either council states a direction on retaining rights, pursuing a sale or lease, or setting an offers timeline. Until then, the item 3 record explains the goals discussion and the official agenda shows the questions scheduled for both councils. Any later action should be checked against the posted minutes or independently verified recording before it is described as a decision.

From the source record

Official meeting agendaJoint Schertz-Cibolo Council Meeting
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2026 at 6:30 p.m.
City of Schertz agenda ↗
The posted agenda sets five discussion topics and gives residents a way to speak.

Related coverage

The Comal Daily

Comal County, before your second cup.

A clear morning briefing, with direct links to the records and sources behind each story.

By subscribing, you agree to receive The Comal Daily and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.